US officers doubt wisdom of Syria war

US officers doubt wisdom of Syria war
Fri Aug 30, 2013 13:06:16

Current and former military officers in the United States have doubted about impact and wisdom of a military intervention against Syria.

The Barack Obama administration’s plan to launch a military strike against Syria is being received with serious reservations by many in the US military, which is coping with the scars of two lengthy wars and a rapidly contracting budget, according to current and former officers, Washington Post reported on Friday.

Having assumed for months that the United States was unlikely to intervene militarily in Syria, the Defense Department has been thrust onto a war footing that has made many in the armed services uneasy, according to interviews with more than a dozen military officers ranging from captains to a four-star general.

Former and current officers, many with the painful lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan on their minds, said the main reservations concern the potential unintended consequences of launching cruise missiles against Syria.

Some questioned the use of military force as a punitive measure and suggested that the White House lacks a coherent strategy. If the administration is ambivalent about the wisdom of defeating or crippling the Syrian government, possibly setting the stage for Damascus to fall to fundamentalist militants, they said, the military objective of strikes on the Syrian military targets is at best ambiguous.

“There’s a broad naiveté in the political class about America’s obligations in foreign policy issues, and scary simplicity about the effects that employing American military power can achieve,” said retired Lt. Gen. Gregory S. Newbold, who served as director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the run-up to the Iraq war, noting that many of his contemporaries are alarmed by the plan.

Marine Lt. Col. Gordon Miller, a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, warned this week of “potentially devastating consequences, including a fresh round of chemical weapons attacks and a military response by Israel."

A National Security Council spokeswoman said Thursday she would not discuss “internal deliberations.” White House officials reiterated Thursday that the administration is not contemplating a protracted military engagement.

Still, many in the military are skeptical. Getting drawn into the Syrian war, they fear, could distract the Pentagon in the midst of a vexing mission: its exit from Afghanistan, where US troops are still being killed regularly. A young Army officer who is wrapping up a year-long tour there said soldiers were surprised to learn about the looming strike, calling the prospect “very dangerous.”

NTJ/BA

Category:
string(835) "[{"id":"1510090","sort":"3081347","contenttypeid":"21","pic":"/2013/08/27/alalam_635131913333085565_25f_4x3.jpg","title":"US cancels Syria meeting with Russia"} ,{"id":"1510562","sort":"3081348","contenttypeid":"21","pic":"/2013/08/28/alalam_635132892063218962_25f_4x3.jpg","title":"Imperialist powers push US to Syria war: Brzezinski"} ,{"id":"1510587","sort":"3081349","contenttypeid":"21","pic":"/2013/08/28/alalam_635132918879995476_25f_4x3.jpg","title":"Israel quietly drives US war on Syria"} ,{"id":"1511101","sort":"3081350","contenttypeid":"21","pic":"/2013/08/29/alalam_635133921658674695_25f_4x3.jpg","title":"Global opposition grows against US attack on Syria"} ,{"id":"1511167","sort":"3081351","contenttypeid":"21","pic":"/2013/08/29/alalam_635134001375620148_25f_4x3.jpg","title":"5th US destroyer heads toward Syria"} ]"